2009 Silver Birch Sauvignon Blanc (Octavin)

The Real Meaning of “Value”

I just don’t get it.

A few people I really like and respect have reviewed this wine ahead of me. Jason over at Jason’s Wine Blog (who, it should be noted, specializes in reviewing wine at the lower end of the price spectrum), while not formally giving the 2009 Silver Birch in the bladder inside the octagonal cardboard the once-over, did mention it in a recent post as “…impressive and… a crowd favorite.

A couple of my homeboys (as it were), including fellow Trés Amigo Josh Wade at Drink Nectar wrote this guy up, and gave it a 3 out of 5, which I translate in my little head as something resembling an 80 on the Robert Parker point scale. Josh mentions specifically that this is a value buy.

The same score was given out by Those Who Are The Best New Wine Blog Twentyten at Swirl, Smell, Slurp, where both She and He gave, individually, a score of 3 out of 5. They refer to the wine as “good” after calling food They consumed “great,” so I have to consider that a less-than-rousing endorsement of the wine—but an endorsement nonetheless.

Liking this a bit more is my buddy and fellow fantasy baseballer Josh Sweeney at wine(explored). With his forgiveness, I am going to include here his entire review verbatim, including his 7 out of 10 (which, in my little messed up world, is something like an 85 on Parker’s scale):

2009 Silver Birch Sauvignon Blanc: 7/10. This is a classic, aggressive, beautifully flavored Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc. I actually had a lot of trouble keeping my pace with this box. It drank so well for so long, I actually finished it a week early. If you can get the 2009 before we hit 2011, I highly, highly recommend it for anyone who likes a crisp, acidic Sauv Blanc.

Josh likes.

So, the consensus seems to be that this is average-to-good wine, that when coupled with its price (around $24 for a 3L box, or about $6 per bottle-equivalent) is recommended pretty much across the board by my blogging contemporaries.

I don’t fucking see it.

This is plonk. This is nigh-undrinkable, one-note, over-acidic plonk, and I can’t consider wine like that a “value” at any price, including free (which, because this was sent to me by someone involved in the promotion of this product, it was).

I think the wine blog whateversphere has found itself in the dangerous territory of trying to redefine “value.” High value is not necessarily correlated with low price.

The Chateâu d’Yquem I reviewed last week, regardless of how good it is (and oh my GOD it is good) cannot be considered a “value.” It costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $300-$400 per bottle-equivalent (and is much more common in the 375ml half-bottle). But that’s not why. It can’t be considered a “value” because that price point is basically the worldwide peak for Sauternes.

However, the $30 Napa cult wine The Prisoner is absolutely a value. It drinks like a $60-$80 bottle. Many people would argue that wine that costs $30 (or $20, or some other arbitrary number) cannot be considered “value” wine, because it is out of some people’s price range.

To me, this is a bastardization of the concept of “value,” and leads to situations like this: crap wine given more than its due simply because it costs less than a child’s ticket to the cinema.

So here are my notes.

The wine looks like a sauv blanc, very light yellow-to-clear in the glass. On the nose is a light alcohol sting (but not terrible), grapefruit, and some grass.

The palate, however, is all one note. This tastes like grapefruit juice. Almost sour, but really, it’s the high, unbalanced acidity here that is making me think “underripe grapefruit.” Can’t blame the grapefruit for that. Did I mention this tastes like grapefruit juice?

I can’t call that a value, personally. And I can’t recommend this wine.

Verdict: C-

P.S., since I compared everyone’s else’s score to the RMPJOHPS (Robert M. Parker Jr. One Hundred Point Scale), I will tell you that in my little world—where we are right now—a C- is something in the high 60s. Definitely under 70 points.

P.P.S., a 12-pack of 32oz bottles of Ocean Spray white grapefruit juice will run you about $35. That’s around $2.30 per 750ml. Just sayin’.

(full disclosure: this wine was received as a press sample. No way I’d pay for this.)

2009 Silver Birch Sauvignon Blanc

2009 Silver Birch Sauvignon Blanc

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Real Meaning of “Value” | Notes From The Cellar -- Topsy.com

  • http://drinknectar.com Josh Wade

    Oh, calling us out my friend. :) – The following is all in good lively discussion…

    Your C- would be the equivelant to my 3- and my 3 would be the equivelant to your C. I did call the wine one dimensional, steely and attacking the nose 'not in a good way.' HOWEVER, value is defined as “An amount, as of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent for something else; a fair price or return.” For equivelant to $5 a bottle this provides a good return on that investment for quite a few people. Four of us seem to agree on that fact as do the other four reviews in Cellar Tracker that rate it an 85. So, that's 8 opinions of value to your 1 of not.

    I'm all for your review and I think it's great that you're honest…but maybe you need to redefine your definition of value.

    Josh
    drinknectar

  • Josh Wade

    Would be nice if I could spell “equivalent” – sheesh

  • http://notesfromthecellar.com Steve Paulo

    Sorry I got your rating system calibration off, it's not always easy to translate!

    You make a fair point, but that seems like a pedestrian, dictionary definition of “value.” When I think of something truly being a “value,” I think of something I'm getting for a cost that is lower than the thing's worth to me. If the cost equaled the worth, it would just be “normal” in that regard.

    Also, thinking of this wine in a per-750ml cost structure is a bit disingenuous, since you can't buy $6 worth of it. The investment is still $24, even if the amount you receive is 4x a usual bottle.

    Finally: you know I don't care if I'm an island of a man ;)

  • http://norcalwingman.com Norcalwingman

    I wonder if you salted a highball glass and added a shot of vodka if it would make a decent greyhound?

    Well, I have abox of this sitting on the bench waiting for review. I must say, this makes me warry, to be sure.

    I've been on a Sauv Blanc kick lately. I tasted some seriously good ones over at Rutherford Dust tasting the other day too!

    Should be fun (or terrible)
    Cheers
    Brian
    norcalwingman

  • http://notesfromthecellar.com Steve Paulo

    This is essentially my point, Jesse. It's also where I believe this wine falls down, and cannot be considered a “value.” In my opinion, it tastes just as cheap as it costs.

  • http://notesfromthecellar.com Steve Paulo

    Good luck, Brian! Go into any tasting with an open mind. As Josh points out below, I am, by significance, the minority voice here.

  • http://notesfromthecellar.com Steve Paulo

    We're none of us perfect ;)

  • http://twitter.com/wineaccguy Joshua S. Sweeney

    Haha all I can say is “fair enough.” I'll keep my Silver Birch to myself next time you're around :)

  • Jesse

    i'm of the mindset – if a wine is 'punching above its weight class,' it's a good value. i just like saying 'punching above its weight class' more than anything.

  • http://brokewino.com/ Sam @brokewino

    Value is totally an abused word in wine blogs, too often used as a synonym of bargain. To tee off of your point, just because you got a buzz off something that cost you $6 doesn't mean it's a value in a quality sense. Shit, go buy some Thunderbird, that's some fuckin' value.

  • http://twitter.com/vinotology Ben Simons

    I haven't tasted this one yet, so I can't really comment on it. I do think that the “punching about its weight class” line is how I would view value though. Your point about not boiling these boxed wines down to $6 a bottle is well taken. If you can't drink all of the wine before it takes a crap, then you didn't get a good value out of it. I guess you would just have to view it as being reserved for large gatherings or something, in which case you have to ask whether you would want to serve it to a large gathering.

  • Pingback: Yet Another Summer Wine Value « wine(explored) by wine(accessorized)

  • http://twitter.com/wineaccguy Joshua S. Sweeney

    Well, I personally did like the wine, and I managed to quaff the whole box before it “took a crap” so to speak, so I would still call it a value wine.

    And boiling it down to a price per bottle suits my model just fine, but that's where Steve and I will agree to disagree ;-)